𝙒𝙝𝙮 “𝙒𝙚 D𝙤𝙣’𝙩 B𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙚𝙫𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙥𝙞𝙘𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙨” 𝙞𝙨 𝙖 F𝙖𝙡𝙨𝙚 A𝙧𝙜𝙪𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩
𝗗𝗼𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 C𝗵𝗼𝗼𝘀𝗲: W𝗵𝘆 G𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 H𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗻 I𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹 P𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘆 W𝗵𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 E𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗶𝘁 𝗼𝗿 N𝗼𝘁
Dani Rodrik (Harvard University) argues that governments are “doomed to choose” and inevitably engage in industrial policy, whether they explicitly acknowledge it or not. His core point is that even seemingly neutral policies have differential impacts on various sectors and industries, effectively shaping the economic structure.
𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗶𝘁 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗣𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘆: Governments constantly make decisions that favour or disadvantage certain economic activities. These can include investments in infrastructure (benefiting transportation and related industries), education policies (shaping the skills available for different sectors), tax structures (offering incentives or disincentives), and regulations (affecting specific industries). Even a stated commitment to “market neutrality” often masks underlying biases and consequences that steer the economy in particular directions.
𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁 𝗙𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: Rodrik highlights that developing economies, in particular, face significant market failures that hinder structural transformation towards higher productivity sectors. These failures often involve information externalities, coordination problems, and the need for firms to discover their comparative advantages. A purely hands-off approach leaves these issues unaddressed.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗲𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: To overcome these market failures and facilitate economic development, Rodrik argues that governments need to actively intervene.
𝗜𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗣𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘆 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀: He views effective industrial policy not as the government “picking winners,” but as a collaborative process between the public and private sectors to identify opportunities, address obstacles, and learn about underlying costs and potential. This necessitates experimentation, monitoring, and a willingness to adapt policies based on feedback.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗵𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲: Because government actions invariably affect the industrial structure, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗼 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘆, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘆 𝗮 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 – explicit and well-designed, or implicit, ad-hoc, and potentially less effective.
