From the FT today: ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ค๐ฃ๐ค๐ข๐ฎ ๐๐จ ๐๐ฃ ๐ ๐ซ๐ช๐ก๐ฃ๐๐ง๐๐๐ก๐ ๐ฅ๐ค๐จ๐๐ฉ๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐๐ง๐ ๐๐จ ๐ ๐๐ก๐ค๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐ค๐ฃ๐ค๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ค๐ฌ๐ฃ๐ฉ๐ช๐ง๐ฃ. Post-financial crisis and pandemic struggles have only been worsened by unpredictable U.S. policies.
๐จ๐ ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ ๐ด๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐๐ต ๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐น๐น๐ฎ๐ฝ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ. Between 2007 and 2024, UK productivity rose just 5.9%, compared to 38% from 1990 to 2007. Real wages only increased by 2.2%.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ณ ๐ถ๐๐ป’๐ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐บ๐๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ. Since 2019, UK productivity fell by 0.8%, with the U.S. leading at 9.1%. U.S. productivity gains aren’t limited to tech; broader investment in R&D and ICT has driven growth. Meanwhile, UK sectors, including healthcare, drag on productivity.
๐จ.๐ฆ. ๐ณ๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ข๐ฉ๐๐-๐ญ๐ต ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ถ๐บ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฒโ25% of GDPโand allowed labor market churn, better jobs, and higher wages. Bidenomics, though imperfect, carefully used interventionist policies. The U.S.’s size and resources make such strategies more feasible than in the UK.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐จ๐ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ป๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ๐. To prevent stagnation, active policies are essential.
๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ด๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ ๐บ๐ถ๐
๐๐ผ ๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ. And we need to get beyond the politics of exhortation, and move into delivery.
https://lnkd.in/e5pR8eNX
5. Beyond slogans: a grown-up conversation about UK industrial strategy (Article 5 of 5 on industrial policy)
The preceding four articles have sought to build perspectives on the role of industrial development in local and regional economies. In this final article. I tie this together by looking at the role of industrial policy and strategy. The perennial question for the UK:...